Obama, Israel, the Arab Spring (updated)
Posted in jewish-israel, politics on May 23rd, 2011 by Ira Altschiller – Comments OffThe MSM has labeled and endlessly repeated their own coinage: Arab Spring. The phenomenon, of repressed Arab populations attempting to overthrow dictators, is indeed in process and one can hope for the best; but Arab Spring implies an outcome — a treacly Disneyland of freedom and democracy. This is far from certain and probably unlikely. There is no supporting example.
Obama was feeling pressure from advisors: you have to say something about the Arab Spring or you will continue to “lead from behind”. (“Leading from behind” is an Orwellian construction — pure self-satire.) So Obama, obeying interior dictates only he can understand, marches to the microphone and makes a speech, prior to Netanyahu’s visit, declaring longstanding American policy. This is then enabled using just that argument: longstanding policy. But why stir the pot with a pro forma speech just before the visit of one of the parties in an upcoming negotiation if nothing new is being said? The MSM asked this question and…wait, no, they never did…
What the MSM does not suggest is what is left out — the elisions; such an Israeli / Palestinian agreement must be in accordance with “conditions on the ground,” which is also longstanding US policy. Obama has estranged our ally and not won any friends in his ingratiations. This is characteristic of his leadership chops; no sense of the actual issues or judgment about focus. A president who squanders opportunities and credibility.
Soon the Iranian client state in Gaza will be merging with the kleptocracy in the West Bank. What possible hope for peace can there be in that? No matter the public declarations, it is transparent what the nature of Palestinian governance is all about.
For there to be peace Palestinians will have to renounce a culture of hatred and murder. Obama could not bring himself to say that because he knew he could only pressure Israel. Abbas had made plain in a recent op-ed and his enthusiasm for a UN declaration preemptively establishing a state (which Obama begged to be rescinded) that Abbas could care less what Obama wants. Thus dissed, Obama turns to our ally to pressure so he seems to be doing something.
Although Obama could not say it, or probably conceive the idea, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor could:
Stop naming public squares and athletic teams after suicide bombers. And come to the negotiating table when you have prepared your people to forego hatred and renounce terrorism — and Israel will embrace you. Until that day, there can be no peace with Hamas. Peace at any price isn’t peace; it’s surrender.

UPDATE
Obama saying today (5/25/2011) in the UK what he should have said originally:
“Hamas… has not renounced violence and has not recognized the state of Israel,” he told reporters this morning at a joint-press conference with the U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron. ”Until they do, it is very difficult to expect the Israelis to have a serious conversation, because ultimately they have to have confidence that the Palestinian state is going to stick to whatever bargain is struck,” he said.
…
“…I don’t want the Palestinians to forget that they have obligations as well…That is, I think, going to be a critical aspect of us being able to jump-start this process once again.”
A re-focus that was necessary for Obama to have any credibility as leader, peacemaker, or thinker.





























